Join
If you can move between formal reasoning and ancient narrative without missing a beat, keep reading.
You will design behavioral experiments, build formal reasoning tools, and analyze what happens when conviction overrides calculation. The methods are rigorous. The questions are anything but settled.
Send your background, relevant work, and the question you most want to answer.
The spine of this lab is formal: argumentation frameworks, including the incomplete ones where the missing information is the point. The edge is everything carrying a measurement and no clean mathematics yet. An experiment with its data collected and its analysis unwritten. A tagging schema over mythological corpora that is still a scaffold. A signal that has to survive being real and noisy. You would live on the edge.
Said plainly, because most job posts would not. If you feel guided by numbers, we will not laugh at that and we will not nod along either. The rule here is that a belief earns seriousness by taking a formal shape that can be tested and can lose. Bring the intuition. Expect to formalize it.
Send your background, one thing you proved or disproved, and one pattern you are still chasing.
The most interesting roles at a lab like this have never been posted. They are invented by people who see something we have not seen yet. A designer who visualizes conviction data. A philosopher who codes. An engineer who thinks about consciousness. A storyteller who understands formal systems. Something we cannot imagine until you describe it.
The bar is high. This is not a general application. It is a pitch for a role so compelling we reorganize to make it happen.
Include your concept, 90-day plan, and relevant background.
// Still undecided? That is fine. Go think about it. We will be here, studying the moment you make up your mind.